Darwin’s Theory of Evolution: Criticisms Answered
Sunday, November 1st, 2009A constantly cited weakness in Darwin’s theories is the idea that he set his theory, principally, on the evidence of variation in domestic animals and cultivated plants. I am attempting to secure a stable basis for Darwin’s evolution theory in the variations of species in a state of nature. While the accurate amount and precise quality of these variations is of paramount importance in the various problems that arise when we use the theory to explain the facts of nature, it’s crucial to indicate the actual variations as they are found to exist in a sufficient amount of species. By doing this, we not only have a better and more accurate approximation of variation, we will gain a base of fact by which to test the statements and dissents usually put forth on the study of specific variability. This will reveal that, throughout the study, I refer to to these charts and the facts they illustrate, even as Darwin was given to draw upon his observations of variation among dogs and pigeons.
I have also made what seems to me a fundamental change in my study of the subject. Rather than undertake first the relatively difficult and unfamiliar particulars of variation, I will start with the Struggle for Existence, which is the key phenomenon on which natural selection depends. Then I will explore the particular facts which are relatively familiar and more interesting. My report will have the additional advantage of looking specifically at how natural selection plays in natural environments.
I do admit that my observation contains divergences from some of Darwin’s opinions, nonetheless my entire work tends forcibly to illustrate the utmost importance of Natural Selection over all other processes in the creation of new species. I therefore take up Darwin’s early position, which he modified in later editions of his writings. The fact of natural selection and its influence on the mutation and development of species is the Darwinian doctrine, and on that account, I am a devout advocate of pure Darwinism.
It’s interesting to note the emergence of scientists of the Christian faith who support the new intelligent design theory. Their theory dwells someplace between the purely Biblical opinion of creation theory on the one side and Darwin’s theory of evolution. See the artwork by Michelangelo Adam and God.